Matterial vs Structura
Latin American ERP to budget civil works without Excel, with APU, AIU, scheduling, EVM and roles, with AI at each stage.
Feature comparison
Feature by feature, from public information. "Partial" = exists but limited or not its focus.
| Feature | Structura | Matterial |
|---|---|---|
| Plan & estimate | ||
| Blueprint takeoff | ||
| Budgeting & unit prices (APU) | ||
| Price & material catalog | ||
| Client quotes & proposals | ||
| Public tenders | ||
| Build & operate | ||
| Schedule & critical path | ||
| Purchasing & POs | ||
| Requisitions & inventory | ||
| Subcontracts & progress billing | ||
| Site journal & field reports | ||
| Field mobile app | ||
| Control & finance | ||
| Cost control (budget vs. actual) | ||
| Physical & financial progress | ||
| Change orders | ||
| Collections & AR (CRM) | ||
| Tax invoicing (CFDI) | ||
| Accounting export | ||
| Receipts & expenses (OCR) | ||
| Reports & analytics | ||
| Real-estate developments (land + works + unit sales) | ||
| Buyer portal (link to upload proofs & documents) | ||
| AI & platform | ||
| AI copilot / assistant | ||
| Multi-company & multi-project | ||
| Multi-language & multi-country | ||
Comparison generated with AI from public information; it may contain inaccuracies. Verify with each vendor.
What only Matterial does
- Blueprint takeoff
- Public tenders
- AI copilot / assistant
- Receipts & expenses (OCR)
- Tax invoicing (CFDI)
- Real-estate developments (land + works + unit sales)
- Buyer portal (link to upload proofs & documents)
Structura: What it does well
- Integrated APU + AIU + earned value (EVM)
- Budget without Excel with roles and control
APU and earned value vs. blueprint takeoff and tenders
Structura budgets civil works without Excel, with APU, AIU, scheduling and earned value (EVM), and AI at each stage — strong for teams that want cost rigor and control by indicators. Matterial shares that APU rigor (with OPUS parity) and adds two things that make the difference in Mexico: AI blueprint takeoff and tenders with official exporters. Both put AI in the budget, but Matterial extends it to the whole project: the copilot over your data, the voice journal, receipt and CFDI OCR, and the quote comparator.
When each one fits
If your priority is control by earned value and AIU on civil works, Structura is finely tuned to that. If your priority is going from blueprint to budget in minutes, bidding on public tenders and running the whole project with AI, Matterial gives you more ground. And it is not exclusive in practice: Matterial imports OPUS and catalogs, so you can bring your matrices and prices and evaluate the platform with your own numbers from day one.
Go deeper
Frequently asked questions
Is Matterial an alternative to Structura?
Yes. Matterial is an AI operating system for construction companies that covers estimating, unit prices, scheduling, purchasing, site journal, collections and tenders in one platform, so it can replace Structura for many teams — especially in Mexico and Latin America.
How is Matterial different from Structura?
Matterial adds AI blueprint takeoff (DWG/PDF → budget), an OPUS-parity unit-price engine, public-tender exports and an AI copilot over your own project data — capabilities that are rare or absent in most tools in this category.
Can I migrate from Structura to Matterial?
Matterial imports OPUS files and price catalogs and supplier quotes from Excel/CSV, so you can bring your budgets and prices across instead of starting from scratch.
How does Matterial's pricing compare to Structura?
Matterial charges per organization with unlimited users on higher plans and meters only the AI you use, published transparently — rather than per-seat or quote-only pricing common in the category.
Try Matterial free
From blueprint to build, in one platform. No card.